Reading Summary
My reading for this week was a few pages from the book Common
Threads: Weaving Community through Collaborative Eco-Art by Sharon Kallis
and published by New Society Publishers in 2014.
This chapter of the book discusses the fact that in the
modern times in which we live, we don’t make things ourselves anymore. In the past, items such as food, clothing,
tools, building materials, toys, etc. would have all been made by oneself or one’s
family for personal use. There
has been a progression of outsourcing the manufacturing of these items, first
to local factories, then national factories, and now to factories half way
around the world in developing nations. Kallis states this is possible largely due to the availability of cheap fossil fuels,
and as we now attempt to transition away from reliance on fossil fuels this all
needs to change.
STOP - Made in Canada?
This made me stop and think about the things I buy and where they come from. There aren't too many things I can think of that are made in Canada; big bulky items like sofas and vehicles are still made here, as I suppose those must be costly to ship from far away.
In my town, there are a few local-made items that are very well known around town. One is Pollen Sweaters, which are really nice locally made wool sweaters. They come in a few dozen colors, lots of sizes, and are made to order. They're expensive but I think almost everyone I know owns one.
Here's my daughter wearing a Pollen Sweater, the color is called sweet pea I think. (It's the first sweater pic I found on my phone - lost her tooth on a camping trip!)
Another local business is Cranberry Pottery, which for decades sold pottery made on site. They had about a half dozen different series/motifs, and were a very common gift item. Almost every home has an item or two from Cranberry Pottery somewhere.
Both of these hand made items are a sort of mathematical object when you think about it. There are ratios, amounts, measurements, symmetries, etc. to consider and then use or create. The makers of these items were definitely doing some mathematical thinking!
Kallis introduces the term backsourcing, which might
be defined as reclaiming the making of things that have in the not-too-distant past been
outsourced to be made elsewhere. She acknowledges
that initiatives such as community gardens are examples of backsourcing that
has already begun, but that increased effort ought to be made to backsource
other manufactured items.
She also discusses some of the social-emotional benefits of backsourcing. Backsourcing allows us to relearn lost skills
and un-vent (her term, which I assume is wordplay referencing ‘invent’) ancestral
knowledge that's at risk of being lost due to outsourcing. Kallis claims that “the act of learning to
make for personal use what we have previously purchased is perhaps the most
fundamentally important gift we as individuals can give to ourselves”. She further points out that making things (and
opting out of consumer culture) is empowering, builds self-esteem, gives one an
emotional boost, and creates a sense of pride of a job well-done.
STOP - D.I.Y.
I really agree with Kallis about the satisfying feelings one gets from making your own things. Making home-made products and being self-reliant is very important to my family. On our rural property we have bees, chickens, and a big veggie garden, and generally try to fix and build things ourselves when we can. I think it does feel good to do things yourself - I like that sense of accomplishment, and that food from the garden sure does taste good.
There's still a lot more big-picture backsourcing we could be doing though, but making things like clothing, electricity, and building supplies would really take a lot of effort to do on your own! It's probably more reasonable to focus on skills to enjoy as a hobby, like knitting or woodworking, or little life-hack type things like making your own all purpose cleaner or plant fertilizer, and of course there are little bits of mathematics embedded in all of those activities.
The excerpt ends by her stating that in the following pages she will discuss three backsourcing projects that she’s been personally involved in. I’m curious about reading more about these projects, and if you are too it appears that the full book is available online as a PDF through the UBC library website.
Activity - Rope Making
After watching the two videos on grass rope making, I decided to give it a try. My mom's long-time winter season hobby is weaving (mostly things like rugs, table runners, etc.) and while watching the videos I realized that I'd done this same twisting technique as a child while helping my mom create the tassels on the ends of a rug! See one of her rugs below.
I recall being amazed back then as a child that the two separate twisted strands automatically begin wrapping around each other, and that after a knot was tied in the end it resisted unravelling.
I was interested in some of Susan's ideas about this activity - using upcycled materials and also performing a strength test. I chose to use some plastic shopping bags as my rope material. I chose two different colors so I could more clearly see the pattern that develops.
After my rope was completed I knotted the ends together to make a loop. I hung our hammock chair from the loop and although it stretched out a bit, it had no problem supporting my body weight!







Hi Reed,
ReplyDeleteI see there’s a lot of overlap between the article you read and the insights Megan drew from the film, Vested Interest. Kallis seems to go deeper into the context that got us to where we are, with so much of our goods outsourced and so fewer skills of how to actually make and take care of our direct needs. Definitely a common point of anxiety when thinking about disaster preparedness…
It’s really interesting to learn that this came as the result of the availability of cheap fossil fuels, making such excessively large-scale manufacturing and transport of goods possible. When considering our common needs, if one is looking purely from the lens of how to create the most goods at the least possible cost to decision makers, then fossil fuels seem like a convenient resource to facilitate mass production in an economically efficient way. But when looking from the lens of the planet, the land, animals, human beings, our bodies, our labour, and our physical and mental health, then organizing the whole world in terms of mass production and consumption in service to the bottom line is not only problematic, it is futile. This level of endless extraction does not account for the cyclical and replenishing nature of the planet and all life: that we don’t just have an endless amount of energy without the need for restoration. A system needs to feed back into itself and be nourished to survive – and this includes our own bodies and mental states. What nourishes us? Food, relationships, meaning. I took an ecological economics class as one of my electives, and we talked about circular economies and the importance of local makers as integral parts of those systems. In responding to climate change, the shift away from fossil fuels and towards local maker cultures will help to re-humanize and re-embed production back into social life, and re-embed us into actual relationship with one another and the land and our goods.
I love that there are local businesses that almost everyone you know has items from. When I think about my own context in Toronto, I can only say the same for things like… Ikea. I wish there was more of a collective investment in local businesses to help them thrive, instead of struggle under crushing rent costs. When I think down to the neighbourhood level, though, I can start to relate. There are those local business that I frequently shop at, where I end up meeting and chatting with my neighbours about local matters, and where I get a lot of handmade and locally sourced goods. Still, places in the city that actually handmake all their goods are few and far between (the need for space becomes a barrier). And actually handmaking my goods myself is even one step further – I need space, time, and resources, which are most easily attained by organizing with others. I wonder how many degrees of separation I am from the majority of my goods, and what kinds of craftsmanskills would slash those degrees most effectively. This would be a great math activity. It would help if we were actually given more information about the journeys that our goods take from their source to our door.
Hi Reed,
ReplyDeleteI like your examples of items that are locally made - the sweater looks like excellent quality (and a great color as well!). It is so true that most of the items we buy are produced so far away. For example, in Manitoba, we used to get produce (such as bananas) from BC quite regularly in the grocery stores. Now, instead, our bananas are coming from Costa Rica. I am sure if I delve into this more deeply there would be cost efficiency reasons for this. However, BC is definitely closer to home than Costa Rica!
Kallis's quote “the act of learning to make for personal use what we have previously purchased is perhaps the most fundamentally important gift we as individuals can give to ourselves” can be readily related to some of the videos we watched this week as well. In one of the videos (Vested Interest), she talks about how we have no relationship to our clothes because we do not make them from scratch. I think this idea could be extended to most of the products we use or purchase. We have little relationship to them other than the money that passes hands through the purchase of them.
Your rope making activity related to my reading this week as well. The strength of the rope is not related at all to the material the rope is made of. Instead, the strength of the rope is inherent in the twisting used to create the rope. Super interesting (and useful!) thing to know.